The John Newbery Medal and Current and Past WInners

In the United States, the John Newbery Medal is the most prestigious childrens book award that an author can receive. The Newbery Medal is an annual children’s book award administered by the Association for Library Service to Children (ALSC of the American Library Association (ALA). According to the ALSC section of the ALA Web site, To be selected as the author of the most distinguished contribution to American literature for children, the book must have been published the previous year in English by an American publisher in the United States. The John Newbery Medal, commonly referred to as the Newbery, has been awarded every year since 1922. It is named for John Newbery, an eighteenth-century British bookseller. To be eligible for a Newbery, either winning the Newbery Medal or having your book designated a Newbery Honor Book, the following terms must also be met: The author(s) must be either citizens or residents of the United States. Fiction, non-fiction, and poetry are all eligible, but reprints and compilations are not. The book must be written for children, with children defined as â€Å"persons of ages up to and including fourteen.† The book must be an original work. A book that was originally published in another country is not eligible. The 2016 Newbery Award Winners The 2016 Newbery award winners, the Medal winner, and three Honor Books  include a picture book, a graphic novel, a fairy tale with historical elements and historical fiction. Below is a brief look at the winners and reviews of the books. 2016 John Newbery Medal Winner Author Matt de la Peà ±a won the 2016 Newbery Medal for his picture book Last Stop on Market Street, which Christian Robinson illustrated. The publisher is G. P. Putnam’s Sons, an imprint of Penguin Group (USA). Matt de la Peà ±a is most well-known for his young adult novels, which include Mexican WhiteBoy, The Living, and The Hunted. He is also the author of the Infinity Ring middle-grade books and one other picture book A Nation’s Hope, The Story of Boxing Legend Joe Louis. 2016 Newbery Honor Books The War That Saved My Life,  by Kimberly Brubaker Bradley. While featuring a historical World War II setting, the characters are products of Bradleys imagination. Dial Books for Young Readers, an imprint of Penguin Group (USA) is the publisher. For more information, read the book review of The War that Saved my Life.Roller Girl,  written and illustrated by Victoria Jamieson.  Roller Girl is Victoria Jamieson’sfirst graphic novel for middle-grade readers, and she brings to it her own experiences with the sport of roller derby.  Dial Books for Young Readers, an imprint of Penguin Group (USA) is the publisher.  For more information, read the book review of .Echo, by Pam Muà ±oz Ryan. Scholastic Press, an imprint of Scholastic Inc. is the publisher. Ryan, the author of more than 40 books, has received numerous awards for her writing, including winning the Pura Belprà © Medal twice, for The Dreamer and Esperanza Rising.  For more information, read the book review of E cho. If you are looking for more good books geared towards the 9- to 14-year-old age range, be sure and take a look at the following features about children’s books that have received Newbery Medals or honors: John Newbery Medal Winners: 2015 to 1922The 2014 Newbery Medal Winner and Honor BooksThe 2013 Newbery Medal Winner and Honor BooksThe 2012 Newbery Medal Winner and Honor BooksThe 2011 Newbery Medal Winner and Honor BooksThe 2010 Newbery Medal Winner and Honor BooksThe 2009 Newbery Medal Winner and Honor Books. Source: ALSC/ALA

Cassirer, Nietzsche and Niccolò Machiavellis The Prince...

Cassirer, Nietzsche and Niccolà ² Machiavellis The Prince When the word Renaissance is mentioned, an image of love for antiquity learning and fine arts usually springs to ones mind. Yet this perception, however legitimate it may be in many areas of Renaissance human achievements, shatters in the face of Niccolà ² Machiavellis masterpiece The Prince. Unlike his contemporary Baldassare Castiglione who exemplified subtlety, Machiavelli was ruthlessly practical, nonchalantly callous, and admirably seamless in his logics about the bloody art of political power. By all accounts The Prince, is a handbook on the acquisition and maintenance of political power. Neither can it be argued any otherwise, like Ernest Cassirer has acknowledged in†¦show more content†¦(p164, New Theory of the State) The keen observer that was Machiavelli merely organized and publicized the thoughts that once were only whispered amongst the political elites. However, while The Prince can hardly be convicted of being a product of malice, what the readers cannot forget is that Machiavelli based his Political Ruler 101 on his fundamental and unshakable personal philosophical conviction that men are inherently self-serving. Cassirer recognizes Machiavelli for his cynical side: we shall never understand [man] as long as we are suffering from the illusion of his original goodness (p163, New Theory of the State). Much like Thomas More who had the fictional More and Raphael Hythloday—two halves of his same philosophical self—arguing about the practicality of an ideal society in Utopia, Ernest Cassirer attempted to draw a distinction between Machiavelli the idealist who cherished dreams of a Republic and Machiavelli the pragmatist who was necessarily pessimistic about the natures of human and politics alike. The liberal Machiavelli ventured that the aim of the common people is more honest than that of the nobles (p28); while the cyn ical Machiavelli claimed that any man who tries to be good all the time is bound to come to ruin among the great number who are not good. (p42) The darker Machiavellis views are echoed in Fredrich Nietzsches philosophy. In his Morals as Fossilized Violence, Nietzsche charged that humans at

Explain the importance of Act 3 sc I in Romeo and Juliet Essay Example For Students

Explain the importance of Act 3 sc I in Romeo and Juliet Essay Romeo and Juliet is set in the 16th century. It is about two young aristocrats from families that were sworn to enmity. They fell in love and hoped that their secret love would bring an end to the family feud. However fate had other ideas; their families were instead torn apart by their (unions?) This essay attempts to explore the importance of act 3 scene I (sc) in the story. Act 3 sc I, is all about the hatred from Tybalt towards Romeo and anyone who associates with him. Act 3 sc I, is mostly important because it embodies all aspects, the love and hate, of the play. Act 3 sc I, focuses on the idea of dramatic irony. This is because we the audience know that Romeo has married Juliet and therefore this results in Romeo not striking Tybalt, because he has now developed a sudden respect for him. We know why Romeo is acting very friendly towards Tybalt; however Tybalt, Mercutio and other dont know why he is friendly towards the enemy. therefore building up tension in the audience. Act 3 sc I provides the actions which ultimately lead to the death of the protagonists. On one hand Romeo has just married Juliet, on the other he has just killed Tybalt and is faced with banishment, leaving him with nothing to do but run. Act 3 sc I is set in the Verona market square on a hot day. The day is hot and Mercutios mad blood is stirring, this means that he should be avoided. The fact that the Capulets are around suggests that a fight is to be expected, Benvolio is aware that the Capels are abroad and being the peacekeeper tries to persuade Mercutio to go back inside, lets retire. Mercutio is having a brawl with Benvolio about the sort of person he is, describing his own bad qualities in Benvolio who is in fact not at all violent. Many lines in this play hint that a fight should be expected soon. The main few lines are very close to the real fight. Line 58 thou art a villain. This phrase would be considered as a very nasty insult back in those times. This insult meant that you were a scoundrel or a peasant. This statement outlines the storyline of the play in some ways; this is because the story is about two families who want to prove that they are richer and more important than each other and as I have said Tybalt has just called Romeo a villain. Considering the time this play was written in, people would have taken this statement to heart and may have even killed because of it; therefore this is a very important line. It also important because this is the line that persuades Mercutio to draw his rapier. Another line that is important and is very close to the main fight is Away to heaven respective lenity (line 119). This line is important because it makes you, the audience, think Oh no! Whats going to happen now? this line is used very well in both, Baz Luhrman and the Zefferelli films. Luhrman uses this line by having Romeo whispering in Mercutios ear. He does this so that we have to listen with great concentration; he also does this so that he can create tension for the people who didnt hear the line. Zefferelli uses this line in his film so that everyone can hear Romeo. Romeo says this line where he is near crying therefore adding to the drama and tragedy of the film. Because of this the lines cannot be further improved. Was Malvolio's Treatment Justified EssayThe importance of Act 3 sc I in Romeo and Juliet is great. I say this because this scene influences the fate of Romeo after killing Tybalt. This scene is also very important because it underlines this play as a definite tragedy. After reading this play you can gain an insight into what it was like to be a teenager in those days. However the films show that Romeo and Juliet have left their teens behind. Act 3 sc I is an important scene because it embodies all aspects of the play. It shows that there is love and there is also hate, you can see this because when Tybalt meets Romeo, Romeo reacts as nicely as possible and Tybalt reacts with as much hate as possible. The whole of this play is based on the idea of dramatic irony. Dramatic irony is what builds up the tension for the audience. The dramatic irony in this play turns the story back and forth, once again building up tension for the audience. The structure of the whole play leads to a tragedy. We can see this because of the timing, a very good example of the timing is when Romeo has just killed Tybalt, because Romeo has just married Juliet he wouldnt want to fight Tybalt as he is his kinsman; however he kills Tybalt and is banished. This is great timing as this builds up more tension and makes the audience think oh no! Shakespeare tells the audience of the consequences in most scenes. He does this in act 1 sc I line 90-91, this is where Prince Escales is telling the Montagues and the Capulets: If you ever do disturb our streets again, your lives shall pay the forfeit of peace and in act 3 sc I we can see that Mercutio, Tybalt, and Romeo have forfeited the peace, therefore they would, as the prince said, pay the forfeit of peace. Just before this scene Romeo and Juliet have just married, this scene, act 3 sc I, shows Romeo killing Tybalt therefore disturbing the peace, and building up tension as this is also a part of dramatic irony, as Romeo has not heard of this rule. This is evident because Lady Montague asks Benvolio whether he was close when the fight started. She does this straight after the prince leaves therefore indicating that Romeo was no present when the prince was talking of this rule. Due to the reasons given above I conclude that act 3 sc I is a very important part of this play. The scenes that I have mentioned in the previous paragraph influence the viewers thoughts, this is because they always build up tension and make you question over and over again Why? Why? Why?